In the digital age of 2025, the use of tools such as ChatGPT in businesses raises essential questions about the management, valuation, and perception of work accomplished. Indeed, faced with massive technological innovation, many managers are wondering how to recognize and evaluate the contributions of their teams, especially when these teams rely on advanced artificial intelligence. This article explores how a manager can value and integrate the work accomplished using these new technologies, while preserving the integrity of human relationships and communication within teams.<\/p>\n\n
Today’s professional landscape is constantly evolving, particularly with the emergence of artificial intelligence technologies. Used to increase productivity and performance, these technologies bring opportunities but also challenges. The phenomenon of generative AI, such as ChatGPT, has transformed the roles of employees and managers, creating a new paradigm in which digital tools play a key role. The impact of ChatGPT on team management<\/strong> A study conducted by three HEC researchers and an audit firm showed that even experienced managers have difficulty distinguishing between work done by humans and work generated by artificial intelligence. The results showed that approximately 77% of notes were perceived as having been written using ChatGPT, while the reality was quite different in 50% of cases. This mistrust highlights a fundamental aspect: managers’ perceptions can bias their judgments about the quality of the content produced. Managers’ biased perceptions<\/strong>When managers are informed about the use of AI, they often believe that the quality of work is reduced and that the time spent by consultants on these tasks is reduced. This raises the crucial question of recognizing real effort. Indeed, the arbitrariness of this judgment can influence performance evaluations and, consequently, employees’ career development.<\/p>\n\n Reduced perceived value: A manager may believe that using AI involves less human effort.<\/strong> Decreased trust:<\/p>\n\n Reduced opportunities for collaboration:<\/p>\n\n By believing that a task is completed quickly thanks to AI, the opportunity for teamwork may be diminished. <\/p>\n\n Assess the quality of content produced using specific criteria in addition to the volume of work.<\/p>\n\n Organize feedback sessions to discuss the benefits and challenges encountered in using tools like ChatGPT.<\/p>\n\n Establish ceremonies or awards for the best integrations of AI into teamwork.<\/p>\n\n Recognize team projects that have used AI to achieve successful results. Organize training:<\/strong> Offering training sessions on the optimal use of digital tools, including ChatGPT, strengthens team skills.<\/p>\n\n Integrating tools like ChatGPT into the workplace requires a transformation in the way work is evaluated and valued. Managers must carefully navigate a landscape where perceptions play a crucial role. By adopting strategies that promote transparency, performance measurement, and the appreciation of teamwork, they can transform these innovations into real drivers of success. Failing to recognize human contributions in an advanced technological context could not only limit an organization’s capacity for innovation but also negatively impact employee motivation.<\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In the digital age of 2025, the use of tools such as ChatGPT in businesses raises essential questions about the management, valuation, and perception of work accomplished. Indeed, faced with massive technological innovation, many managers are wondering how to recognize and evaluate the contributions of their teams, especially when these teams rely on advanced artificial […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12573,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1398],"tags":[1968,24925,8064,2550,24928],"class_list":["post-12657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-ai-en","tag-chatgpt-en","tag-manager-en","tag-productivity-en","tag-valuation-en","tag-work-en"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12657","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12657"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12657\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12658,"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12657\/revisions\/12658"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12573"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mon-agent-ia.fr\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Here are some common biases identified:<\/h3>\n\n
Using digital tools can be perceived as cheating, harming perceptions of actual performance.<\/h4>\n\n
Performance metrics:<\/h2>\n\n
Regular feedback:<\/h3>\n\n
Public recognition:<\/h3>\n\n
Highlight shared successes:<\/h2>\n\n
Conclusion: Valorization Pragmatics in the Digital Age<\/h3>\n\n
<\/h2>\n\n